Every expansion-ready company eventually faces this question: Japan or Hong Kong first? Both markets offer compelling opportunities. Both require significant investment. And for most companies, doing both simultaneously means doing neither well.
The answer isn't which market is "better"—it's which market fits your specific situation. Here's how to think through this decision systematically.
The Fundamental Difference
Japan is a destination market. You enter Japan to sell to Japanese companies and consumers. Success is measured by Japanese revenue, Japanese customers, and Japanese market share.
Hong Kong is a gateway market. You enter Hong Kong to access Greater China, Southeast Asia, and the broader Asian region. Success is measured by regional footprint and cross-border opportunity capture.
This distinction should drive your entire evaluation. Ask yourself: are you building a business in one country, or building a platform for regional expansion?
Market Size Reality Check
Japan:
- Population: 125 million
- GDP: $4.2 trillion
- Your addressable market: Entirely in Japan
- Customer acquisition cost: High, but customers are in one country
- Expansion path: Depth in Japan, then maybe other markets
Hong Kong + GBA:
- Hong Kong population: 7.5 million
- Greater Bay Area: 86 million
- Combined GBA GDP: $2+ trillion
- Your addressable market: Potentially all of China
- Customer acquisition cost: Lower in HK, scales to GBA
- Expansion path: GBA, then mainland China, then Southeast Asia
If you need significant scale quickly, Hong Kong's regional access matters. If you can build a successful business in one large market, Japan's standalone size is sufficient.
Customer Profile Matching
Choose Japan first if your customers are:
- Large, traditional enterprises with complex procurement
- Highly quality-conscious with strict requirements
- Willing to pay premium prices for proven solutions
- Located in developed markets (US, Europe, Japan)
- In manufacturing, automotive, robotics, or industrial sectors
Choose Hong Kong first if your customers are:
- High-growth companies moving fast
- Cost-conscious but willing to adopt new technology
- Comfortable with younger companies and newer solutions
- Expanding across Asia themselves
- In tech, e-commerce, logistics, or financial services
Resource Requirements
Japan Entry (Minimum Viable):
- Budget: $300K-500K for first year
- Team: 2-3 people minimum (at least one fluent Japanese speaker)
- Timeline: 18-24 months to first revenue
- Commitment: 3-5 years to achieve meaningful success
- Localization: Extensive (product, docs, support, marketing)
Hong Kong Entry (Minimum Viable):
- Budget: $200K-350K for first year
- Team: 1-2 people (English works, Cantonese helps)
- Timeline: 6-12 months to first revenue
- Commitment: 2-3 years to achieve meaningful success
- Localization: Moderate (English works, Chinese optional)
If resources are constrained, Hong Kong's lower entry barrier matters. If you have resources but need to commit them wisely, Japan's higher threshold is manageable.
Sales Cycle Realities
Japan:
- First meeting to contract: 12-18 months average
- Relationship building phase: 3-6 months before sales discussions
- Consensus building: 4-6 months
- Procurement and legal: 2-4 months
- But: Once won, customers are extremely sticky (95%+ retention)
Hong Kong:
- First meeting to contract: 3-6 months average
- Relationship building: Important but less formal
- Decision making: Faster, less consensus required
- Procurement: More flexible and negotiable
- But: Competition is intense, customer churn is higher
If you need cash flow within 12 months, Hong Kong is more realistic. If you're building for long-term, high-value relationships, Japan's slower cycle is an investment.
Competitive Dynamics
Japan's Competition:
- Established domestic players with deep relationships
- Other foreign companies who've been there for decades
- High barriers to entry create moats once you're in
- Market rewards patience and quality over speed
Hong Kong's Competition:
- Intense competition from global and regional players
- Low barriers mean new competitors enter constantly
- Market rewards speed and adaptability over perfection
- Price pressure is constant
If your competitive advantage is quality and relationship-building, Japan rewards this. If your advantage is speed and innovation, Hong Kong's environment suits you better.
The Product Maturity Factor
Enter Japan first if:
- Your product is mature and proven at scale
- You have extensive documentation and support resources
- Your brand has international recognition
- You can commit to Japanese-language everything
- You have enterprise customer success capabilities
Enter Hong Kong first if:
- Your product is earlier stage and iterating
- You need customer feedback to refine positioning
- Your brand is less established
- English-language support is sufficient initially
- You're comfortable with faster-moving pilots
Strategic Objectives Alignment
Japan makes sense if you want to:
- Build a large, profitable standalone business in one market
- Establish your brand as a quality, premium solution
- Create a reference market for other developed economies
- Demonstrate enterprise-readiness to global customers
Hong Kong makes sense if you want to:
- Access multiple Asian markets efficiently
- Test and refine before major China investment
- Build regional partnerships and channel networks
- Move faster with lower initial investment
The Honest Assessment
Most companies overestimate their readiness for Japan. The market is harder, slower, and more expensive than expected. Companies that succeed commit fully—half-measures fail.
Most companies underestimate Hong Kong's strategic value. They see a small city-state, not the gateway to the world's largest consumer market. Companies that succeed think regionally, not locally.
Decision Framework
Answer these questions honestly:
-
Can you commit 3+ years to one market before breaking even? If yes, Japan. If no, Hong Kong.
-
Is your product/service proven in developed markets? If yes, Japan. If no, Hong Kong.
-
Do you have Japanese-speaking team members or leadership commitment to hire them? If yes, Japan. If no, Hong Kong.
-
Is regional expansion more valuable than deep penetration in one market? If yes, Hong Kong. If no, Japan.
-
Can you handle 12-18 month sales cycles without cash flow pressure? If yes, Japan. If no, Hong Kong.
If you answered "yes" to most questions, you're Japan-ready. If you answered "no" to most, Hong Kong is your better starting point.
The Sequential Strategy
Here's what sophisticated companies do: they choose one market, execute properly, and then expand to the other.
Japan First Path: Succeed in Japan (3-5 years) → Use Japanese success as credibility → Enter Hong Kong/GBA with proven model → Expand across Asia
Hong Kong First Path: Succeed in Hong Kong/GBA (2-3 years) → Build regional footprint → Enter Japan with resources and learnings → Leverage both platforms
Neither sequence is better—they're different strategies for different companies. What doesn't work is trying to do both simultaneously without the resources to execute properly in either.
The Bottom Line
Japan and Hong Kong aren't competing choices—they're different strategies requiring honest assessment of your capabilities, resources, and objectives.
Japan rewards companies that can commit deeply, move patiently, and build for the long term. Hong Kong rewards companies that move quickly, think regionally, and adapt continuously.
Choose based on who you are, not which market sounds more attractive. Then commit fully to that choice.
Need help evaluating which market fits your situation? Let's work through your specific context and build the right strategy.